ACC 306 WEEK 1 DQ 2 JUDGMENT CASE 13 TO 9 ASH COURSE

ACC 306 WEEK 1 DQ 2 JUDGMENT CASE 13 TO 9 ASH COURSE
To purchase this visit here:
HTTP://WWW.NERDYPUPIL.COM/PRODUCT/ACC-306-WEEK-1-DQ-2-JUDGMENT-CASE-13-TO-9-ASH-COURSE/
Contact us at:
[email protected]
ACC 306 WEEK 1 DQ 2 JUDGMENT CASE 13 TO 9 ASH COURSE
ACC 306 Week 1 DQ2 Judgment Case 13-9
Judgment Case 13–9 – Valleck Corporation – Loss contingency and full disclosure ? LO5 LO6
In the March 2012 meeting of Valleck Corporation’s board of directors, a question arose as to the way a possible obligation should be disclosed in the forthcoming financial statements for the year ended December 31. A veteran board member brought to the meeting a draft of a disclosure note that had been prepared by the controller’s office for inclusion in the annual report. Here is the note:
On May 9, 2011, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a Notice of Violation (NOV) to Valleck alleging violations of the Clean Air Act. Subsequently, in June 2011, the EPA commenced a civil action with respect to the foregoing violation seeking civil penalties of approximately $853,000. The EPA alleges that Valleck exceeded applicable volatile organic substance emission limits. The Company estimates that the cost to achieve compliance will be $190,000; in addition the Company expects to settle the EPA lawsuit for a civil penalty of $205,000 which will be paid in 2014.
“ Where did we get the $205,000 figure? ” he asked. On being informed that this is the amount negotiated last month by company attorneys with the EPA, the director inquires, “Aren’t we supposed to report a liability for that in addition to the note? ”
Required:
Explain whether Valleck should report a liability in addition to the note. Why or why not? For full disclosure, should anything be added to the disclosure note itselfHome Work Hour aims to provide quality study notes and tutorials to the students of ACC 306 Week 1 DQ 2 Judgment Case 13 to 9 Ash Course in order to ace their studies….